This struggle continues to this day in a number of different social, political and cultural contexts.Īs part of a larger book project on the shaping of memory of the Sarajevo assassination, I focus on the shifting memorial landscape at the murder site. Indeed, from the moment news of the Archduke's death got out, the struggle over its meaning began. All these acts-creating, promoting and destroying Princip's footprints, not to mention re-enacting the murder itself-constitute just some of nearly a century's worth of interpretations, commemorations, representations and manipulations of the Sarajevo assassination.
They soon became one of Sarajevo's main tourist attractions, photographed by thousands of visitors, typically with someone standing directly in the footprints, posing like the assassin. Princip's footprints had been embedded into the concrete sidewalk by the government of post-World War II communist Yugoslavia, which exalted the assassin far more than the unstable interwar state. Yugoslavia, with the help of the Great Powers, was indeed born out of that war, and so too was the short, but troubled twentieth century. Yet the consequences were far more than Princip and his co-conspirators had bargained for: this event became the euphemistic "spark that lit the fuse," igniting the First World War. The infamous Jassassination aimed to remove Austria-Hungary from Bosnia and Herzegovina, and thus clear the way for a unified Yugoslav (South Slav) state. When Serbian artillery began pounding Sarajevo in spring 1992, Bosnian Muslims struck back by destroying a potent symbol of Serb nationalism: the footprints marking the exact spot Gavrilo Princip stood when he shot dead Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The following is a summary of his presentation. He spoke at an EES Noon Discussion on January 10, 2007. Miller is Associate Professor of History, International University of Sarajevo and McDaniel College. Careers, Fellowships, and Internships Open/Close.Wahba Institute for Strategic Competition.Science and Technology Innovation Program.Refugee and Forced Displacement Initiative.The Middle East and North Africa Workforce Development Initiative.Kissinger Institute on China and the United States.Nuclear Proliferation International History Project.North Korea International Documentation Project.Environmental Change and Security Program.
Hyundai Motor-Korea Foundation Center for Korean History and Public Policy.It was considered a tragedy, certainly, but not one which, as British permanent undersecretary of state at the Foreign Office, Sir Arthur Nicolson, wrote eerily to his ambassador in St Petersburg, would “lead to further complications”. On the contrary, countless first-hand accounts support the relative apathy and indifference that greeted the political murder. According to one historian, the political murder was a “flashbulb event” that imprinted itself on the minds and memories of all contemporaries, much like 9/11 or President Kennedy’s assassination. Princip’s sandwich and serendipity may just be another myth, but there’s something more convincing about the notion that Princip’s pistol shots “shook the world”. Was the British army ready for war in 1914?.The Somme: was it really a monstrous failure?.
Why Britain was right to go to war in 1914.“Britain should have stayed out of the First World War” says Niall Ferguson.
0 kommentar(er)
